tBlog - BushLover

BushLover

Blog For Free!

Archives
Home
2004 November

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images

Sponsored
Blog

Free to Good Home - Huggable Little Kerry Supporters

11.16.04 (8:10 am) [edit]

Dear World,

Please take them off our hands. Though they do give us some great entertainment in the form of movies, books, and music, their drag on our society has become too much. This is especially true since a majority of the Kerry voters are the same groups that want a free ride at the expense of the workers in America. They are natural socialists.

Since it appears they are not happy here and the rest of the world loves what they love, take them in an treat them like one of your own.

If you take one of these cute but whiney citizens off our hands we will throw in a year of tofu and bean sprouts to feed them.

Sincerely,
American Taxpayer

Free Therapy for Democrat Losers - Listen to Limbaugh - It's Good To Ya!!!

11.16.04 (7:48 am) [edit]

http://www.bocaratonnews.com/index.php?src=news&category=Loc al%20News&prid=10210

Psychologists blast Rush Limbaugh for mocking traumatized Kerry voters
Post Election Selection Trauma is a real problem, Florida clinicians say

Published Tuesday, November 16, 2004 at 1:00 amby Sean Salai

Mental health officials in South Florida blasted Rush Limbaugh on Monday, saying the conservative talk show host’s offer of “free therapy” for traumatized John Kerry voters has made a mockery of a valid psychological problem.
“Rush Limbaugh has a way of back-handedly slamming people,” said Sheila Cooperman, a licensed clinician with the American Health Association (AHA) who listened Friday as Limbaugh offered to personally treat her patients. “He’s trying to ridicule the emotional state this presidential election produced in many of us here in Palm Beach County. Who is he to offer therapy?”
The Boca Raton News reported last week that more than 30 distraught Kerry supporters in South Florida contacted the non-profit AHA following their candidate’s Nov. 3 concession to President Bush. AHA officials have diagnosed the disorder as Post Election Selection Trauma (PEST) and have scheduled the first of several free group therapy sessions for just after Thanksgiving.
Cooperman, whose professional practice is based in Delray Beach, said the election-related symptoms she sees in the Kerry supporters more than quality PEST as “a legitimate syndrome or disorder within the trauma spectrum,” according to the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
“Rush Limbaugh has no clinical qualifications to counsel anyone,” Cooperman said. “He’s not only minimizing PEST, but he’s bastardizing the entire psychological field and our clinical expertise.”
Rob Gordon, AHA executive director, said Limbaugh’s radio musings caused the charity to receive hundreds of calls and letters from gloating Republicans. But he said he also received a small batch of letters and e-mails from people who said they understood why some Kerry voters would need therapy.
A man named Paul wrote to AHA, “I too was very depressed, and I knew a lot people who felt the same way. You have to understand that to many of us, this was the key election about the future of our country, and with a Bush win that future is pretty much destroyed. Naturally, there’s going to be some significant grief.”
“The people here in Palm Beach County now in therapy or support groups are the canaries in the mine shaft,” Gordon said. “There could be thousands of others, even Republicans, who need to be in therapy over this election.”
Gordon said the AHA on Monday also received its first out-of-state call – from a fixed-income woman in Texas who is “absolutely terrified of what Bush will do” – and scheduled a free telephone therapy session with her for today.
Douglas Schooler, the Boca Raton trauma specialist who treated 20 people with hypnotherapy following Kerry’s loss, said he believes many people suffering from election-related symptoms are still afraid to step forward.“The Republicans want Kerry voters to shut up and pretend they’re not feeling anything,” Schooler said. “But many people have serious emotional pain over this election and it’s unhealthy to stuff it down inside of you. Therapy is the best way.”
Although Schooler said he never listens to Limbaugh, he said he has been deluged by similar phone calls and attacked on South Florida’s radio talk shows.
“Most of the calls I’m getting are from Republicans making fun of the whole thing,” Schooler said. “One guy wrote me a letter saying I should tell people to vote Republican and save themselves the stress. Republicans want to minimize the whole story of election fraud and voter anger.”
Schooler said he did not expect the Republican gloating to stop anytime soon.
Limbaugh, a Palm Beach County resident who owns $26 million worth of property in the area, read the two Boca News exclusives on his nationally syndicated radio program last week.
“So if anybody on the left wants some serious therapy here and counseling, I’m more than willing to offer my assistance as well,” Limbaugh said on Nov. 9.
On Nov. 12, accused by Gordon of picking up the story to rub it in the faces of Democrats, Limbaugh said, “Now, my friends, I didn’t do that. I reached out. I offered a hand of friendship. I offered my own counseling services.”
AHA officials, listening to the taped broadcasts, described Limbaugh’s tone of voice as sarcastic.

All Hail The New Victims -- Democrats

11.13.04 (5:02 pm) [edit]

All Hail The New Victims -- Democrats

Just when I thought it was impossible for Democrats to sink any lower in their post-election tantrums -- after all, it's hard to top secession as a political strategy for the arrested-development set -- now they have their very own psychological disorder, according to the Boca Raton News:

The Boca Raton News reported Tuesday that Palm Beach, Florida trauma specialist Douglas Schooler alone has already treated 15 clients and friends with intense hypnotherapy since the Democratic candidate conceded on November 3.

"I had one friend tell me he's never been so depressed and angry in his life," Schooler said. "I observed patients threatening to leave the country or staring listlessly into space. They were emotionally paralyzed, shocked and devastated," he told the daily.

"We're calling it 'post-election selection trauma' and we're working to develop a counseling program for it," said Rob Gordon, the Boca Raton-based executive director of the American Health Association.

I have a theory that Democrats are secretly thrilled to have lost this election to George Bush, and this report confirms it. Nothing makes a Leftist happier than to belong to a victim class, and now they have created one that may exceed any that came before. It makes them feel more complete than even an official apology would. Next up, of course, is forcing employers and health-care providers to recognize it as a disability under ADA.

I would have thought that such a report could only be published by the Onion, but unfortunately this may be the least irrational reaction by Democrats this week. We've had MS-NBC's Lawrence O'Donnell call for secession, his colleague Keith Olbermann proclaim the election rigged (while providing no evidence whatsoever), and massive requests for immigration information from Kerry supporters to everywhere except, oddly enough, France.

So far, the Democrats are demonstrating that they are anything but; in order to support democracy, one has to accept when their candidate loses as well as when they win. I'd like to ask how it feels to be less committed to democracy than the Afghanis, whose opposition candidates readily accepted their election results despite numerous hardships and difficulties. It's embarrassing when mainstream voices in a major party call for the breakup of the United States, and it's an insult to the men who gave their lives to keep the Union together less than 150 years ago, especially since the stakes are so superficial and petty.

At least they gave the "illness" a good name. Post-election selection trauma, or PEST, describe these summer patriots to a T.

NY Times Suggests Arafat Died of AIDS

11.12.04 (5:56 pm) [edit]

NY Times Suggests Arafat Died of AIDS

The New York Times broke the media silence on the cause of Arafat's death Friday by suggesting the terrorist leader may have died from AIDS.

In an article entitled "Secrecy by Aides and Silence by Doctors Persists, and What Killed Arafat Is Still a Mystery", the paper chronicled Arafat's rapid health decline, and the mystery shrouding his illness. The paper reported: "Even after Yasir Arafat's death this morning, French health officials continued their stony silence about exactly what disease killed the Palestinian leader. And so the man who lived so much of his life simply and in the public eye, died mysteriously, surrounded by secrecy." The spokesman for the French hospital where Arafat died said that officials would not release any tests, detail the cause of death, or even acknowledge whether had an autopsy had been conducted.

The Times noted that a tight circle of aides to Arafat had access to him and his doctors. They have kept a tight lid on details of his health and death. Unlocking the mystery of Arafat's death might come from several clues. Two days before his death, aides revealed that Arafat was in a coma after having a brain hemorrhage. But the Times doubts this stroke was likely not the cause of Arafat's maladies. Another clue: "At the time of his medical evacuation to Paris two weeks ago, aides disclosed that he was suffering from a low platelet count and had undergone a platelet transfusion. Since platelets are involved in blood clotting, patients with low counts are predisposed to brain hemorrhages, so Mr. Arafat's platelet count may have contributed to his death." Then the Times noted the AIDS connection: "But low platelet counts in the blood are a common finding in a wide range of afflictions, including severe infections, liver disease, end stage cancer and even AIDS." The Times revelation gives credence to internet buzz that Arafat may have died of AIDS. Some suggested that Arafat's apparent dementia - a symptom of AIDS - in his closing days was one sign he may be suffering from the immune disorder.

French officials have put to rest rumors that Arafat had been poisoned. This story was widely circulated in the Arab world, as evidenced by the reaction of Arafat's Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, whose new leadership said in a statement sent to Agence France Presse, "Zionist Israel and the government of Sharon are responsible for the assassination of our leader by putting him under siege."

Bush Has Higher IQ Than Kerry

11.07.04 (7:38 pm) [edit]

Intelligence tests taken in the 1960's show that Mr. Bush had an I.Q. in the 95th percentile of the population and that John Kerry's was in the 91st percentile.

Yet stupid liberals continue to call Bush stupid. I now submit that by comparison, Kerry is a dolt.

When Tom Brokaw asked Mr. Kerry about a report that Mr. Bush's I.Q. was higher than his, this is how he responded? "That's great. More power."

Kerry was right. That is great and Bush does have more power.

Next time liberals call a Republican stupid, they might want to check the tests first.

A Good Example of What Liberals Think - "We are the Anointed Ones"

11.05.04 (7:30 am) [edit]

Why Americans Hate Democrats—A Dialogue
The unteachable ignorance of the red states.
By Jane Smiley
Updated Thursday, Nov. 4, 2004, at 3:24 PM PT

The day after the election, Slate's political writers tackled the question of why the Democratic Party—which has now lost five of the past seven presidential elections and solidified its minority status in Congress—keeps losing elections. Chris Suellentrop says that John Kerry was too nuanced and technocratic, while George W. Bush offered a vision of expanding freedom around the world. William Saletan argues that Democratic candidates won't win until they again cast their policies the way Bill Clinton did, in terms of values and moral responsibility. Timothy Noah contends that none of the familiar advice to the party—move right, move left, or sit tight—seems likely to help. Slate asked a number of wise liberals to take up the question of why Americans won't vote for the Democrats. Click here to read previous entries.

I say forget introspection. It's time to be honest about our antagonists. My predecessors in this conversation are thoughtful men, and I honor their ideas, but let's try something else. I grew up in Missouri and most of my family voted for Bush, so I am going to be the one to say it: The election results reflect the decision of the right wing to cultivate and exploit ignorance in the citizenry. I suppose the good news is that 55 million Americans have evaded the ignorance-inducing machine. But 58 million have not. (Well, almost 58 million—my relatives are not ignorant, they are just greedy and full of classic Republican feelings of superiority.)

Ignorance and bloodlust have a long tradition in the United States, especially in the red states. There used to be a kind of hand-to-hand fight on the frontier called a "knock-down-drag-out," where any kind of gouging, biting, or maiming was considered fair. The ancestors of today's red-state voters used to stand around cheering and betting on these fights. When the forces of red and blue encountered one another head-on for the first time in Kansas Territory in 1856, the red forces from Missouri, who had been coveting Indian land across the Missouri River since 1820, entered Kansas and stole the territorial election. The red news media of the day made a practice of inflammatory lying—declaring that the blue folks had shot and killed red folks whom everyone knew were walking around. The worst civilian massacre in American history took place in Lawrence, Kan., in 1862—Quantrill's raid. The red forces, known then as the slave-power, pulled 265 unarmed men from their beds on a Sunday morning and slaughtered them in front of their wives and children. The error that progressives have consistently committed over the years is to underestimate the vitality of ignorance in America. Listen to what the red state citizens say about themselves, the songs they write, and the sermons they flock to. They know who they are—they are full of original sin and they have a taste for violence. The blue state citizens make the Rousseauvian mistake of thinking humans are essentially good, and so they never realize when they are about to be slugged from behind.

Here is how ignorance works: First, they put the fear of God into you—if you don't believe in the literal word of the Bible, you will burn in hell. Of course, the literal word of the Bible is tremendously contradictory, and so you must abdicate all critical thinking, and accept a simple but logical system of belief that is dangerous to question. A corollary to this point is that they make sure you understand that Satan resides in the toils and snares of complex thought and so it is best not try it.

Next, they tell you that you are the best of a bad lot (humans, that is) and that as bad as you are, if you stick with them, you are among the chosen. This is flattering and reassuring, and also encourages you to imagine the terrible fates of those you envy and resent. American politicians ALWAYS operate by a similar sort of flattery, and so Americans are never induced to question themselves. That's what happened to Jimmy Carter—he asked Americans to take responsibility for their profligate ways, and promptly lost to Ronald Reagan, who told them once again that they could do anything they wanted. The history of the last four years shows that red state types, above all, do not want to be told what to do—they prefer to be ignorant. As a result, they are virtually unteachable.

Third, and most important, when life grows difficult or fearsome, they (politicians, preachers, pundits) encourage you to cling to your ignorance with even more fervor. But by this time you don't need much encouragement—you've put all your eggs into the ignorance basket, and really, some kind of miraculous fruition (preferably accompanied by the torment of your enemies, and the ignorant always have plenty of enemies) is your only hope. If you are sufficiently ignorant, you won't even know how dangerous your policies are until they have destroyed you, and then you can always blame others.

The reason the Democrats have lost five of the last seven presidential elections is simple: A generation ago, the big capitalists, who have no morals, as we know, decided to make use of the religious right in their class war against the middle class and against the regulations that were protecting those whom they considered to be their rightful prey—workers and consumers. The architects of this strategy knew perfectly well that they were exploiting, among other unsavory qualities, a long American habit of virulent racism, but they did it anyway, and we see the outcome now—Cheney is the capitalist arm and Bush is the religious arm. They know no boundaries or rules. They are predatory and resentful, amoral, avaricious, and arrogant. Lots of Americans like and admire them because lots of Americans, even those who don't share those same qualities, don't know which end is up. Can the Democrats appeal to such voters? Do they want to? The Republicans have sold their souls for power. Must everyone?

Progressives have only one course of action now: React quickly to every outrage—red state types love to cheat and intimidate, so we have to assume the worst and call them on it every time. We have to give them more to think about than they can handle—to always appeal to reason and common sense, and the law, even when they can't understand it and don't respond. They cannot be allowed to keep any secrets. Tens of millions of people didn't vote—they are watching, too, and have to be shown that we are ready and willing to fight, and that the battle is worth fighting. And in addition, we have to remember that threats to democracy from the right always collapse. Whatever their short-term appeal, they are borne of hubris and hatred, and will destroy their purveyors in the end.
Jane Smiley is the author of many novels and essays. She lives in California.

Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/21092...

Dim Wits For Kerry Can't Get Over It

11.04.04 (4:54 pm) [edit]

Were Kerry supporters dumber than Gump?

Dumb is as dumb does. Somehow with all the supposed IQ on your side, you guys can't even scam your way through an election effectively, and scam was what you tried. Oh, it hurts doesn't it. It just tears you up. You stupid bastards. You picked a freakin far left liberal with a shady war record, a less than honorable discharge, and televised admissions from him that he is a war criminal. At the same time he indicted the whole generation of men over in Vietnam. Who is stupid? You guys made it easy. We bitch slapped you without trying.

If you didn't have the mainstream media working for Kerry, Bush would have won by 15 points in a landslide.

The Daily Mirror is just a mirror of the mind of the communist left who are useless trash without morality or the will to actually work. You obtained your little degrees and think this makes you smart. Most of you dumb asses couldn't even jump start a car. If we don't agree with you, somehow that means in your self-centered world that we can't reason.

Reason this:
Your dim witted crash dummy of a candidate wasn't up to the task and you picked him. What does that make you?

Seethe on it girlieboys.

Bush Haters- Canada Awaits- Apply Early

11.04.04 (5:05 am) [edit]

Unhappy Democrats Need to Wait to Get Into Canada

Wed Nov 3, 1:16 PM ET

U.S. National - Reuters

By David Ljunggren

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Disgruntled Democrats seeking a safe Canadian haven after President Bush (news - web sites) won Tuesday's election should not pack their bags just yet.

Canadian officials made clear on Wednesday that any U.S. citizens so fed up with Bush that they want to make a fresh start up north would have to stand in line like any other would-be immigrants -- a wait that can take up to a year.

"You just can't come into Canada and say 'I'm going to stay here'. In other words, there has to be an application. There has to be a reason why the person is coming to Canada," said immigration ministry spokeswoman Maria Iadinardi.

There are anywhere from 600,000 to a million Americans living in Canada, a country that leans more to the left than the United States and has traditionally favored the Democrats over the Republicans.

But recent statistics show a gradual decline in U.S. citizens coming to work in Canada, which has a creaking publicly funded healthcare system and relatively high levels of personal taxation.

Government officials, real estate brokers and Democrat activists said that while some Americans might talk about a move to Canada rather than living with a new Bush administration, they did not expect a mass influx.

"It's one thing to say 'I'm leaving for Canada' and quite another to actually find a job here and wonder about where you're going to live and where the children are going to go to school," said one government official.

Roger King of the Toronto-based Democrats Abroad group said he had heard nothing to back up talk of a possible exodus of party members.

"I imagine most committed Democrats will want to stay in the United States and continue being politically active there," he told Reuters.

Americans seeking to immigrate can apply to become permanent citizens of Canada, a process that often takes a year. Becoming a full citizen takes a further three years.

The other main way to move north on a long-term basis is to find a job, which in all cases requires a work permit. This takes from four to six months to come through.

Official statistics show the number of U.S. workers entering Canada dropped to 15,789 in 2002 from 21,627 in 2000. Early indicators on Wednesday showed little sign of this changing.

A spokesman for Canada's foreign affairs ministry said there had been no increase in the number of hits on the Washington embassy's immigration Web site, while housing brokers said they doubted they would see a surge in U.S. business.

"Canada's always open and welcoming to Americans who want to relocate here, but we don't think it would be a trend or movement," said Gino Romanese of Royal Lepage Residential Real Estate Services in Toronto.

Those wishing to move to Canada could always take a risk and claim refugee status -- the path chosen earlier this year by two U.S. deserters who opposed the war in Iraq (news - web sites).

"Anybody who enters Canada who claims refugee status will be provided with a work permit ... it doesn't matter what country they're from," Iadinardi said.

Refugee cases are handled by special boards, which can take months to decide whether to admit applicants. The rulings can be appealed and opposition politicians complain some people ordered deported have been in Canada for 10 years or more.

Bush Haters - Canada Beckons

11.03.04 (8:13 pm) [edit]

We Feel Your Pain - Bush Haters

11.03.04 (7:18 pm) [edit]

It wasn't long ago, about 30 hours ago actually, that the news media was running a scam on the nation with their fake exit polls. Fellow Bush supporters were in severe distress. How could this happen we kept asking ourselves. Today is a new day.

Bush is the winner. If you are a Bush hater, much like the Clinton haters of old, it really galls you that he won again. Oh the pain must be incredible. Honestly, I don't know if I could stand it If I were in your position. I will work on some ideas for you.

In the meantime, remember, it's only four years.

Though I hear Jeb might be considering a run.

Bush Haters- Canada Awaits- Apply Early

11.03.04 (2:13 pm) [edit]

Marxist Bill Moyers Whines

11.03.04 (8:14 am) [edit]

Bill Moyers ranted about how if Kerry had won the right would have attempted a coup.

His one sided support of left wing causes and anti-Republican propaganda have shown us who he really is.

Burn in your own liberal hell Bill Moyers.

Electoral vote count: Bush 274, Kerry 252 :)

11.03.04 (4:23 am) [edit]

Kerry in Denial

OHIO
100% of Precincts Reporting
George W. Bush 2,777,645 - 51 percent
John Kerry 2,632,547 - 48 percent

NATIONAL
95% of Precincts Reporting
George W. Bush 51% 56,732,387
John Kerry 48% 53,004,905

TOTALS:
Bush: 274
Kerry: 252

Alabama 9 - Bush
Alaska 3 - Bush
Arizona 10 - Bush
Arkansas 6 - Bush
California 55 - Kerry

Colorado 9 - Bush
Connecticut 7 - Kerry
Delaware 3 - Kerry
D.C. 3 - Kerry
Florida 27 - Bush

Georgia 15 - Bush
Hawaii 4 - Kerry
Idaho 4 - Bush
Illinois 21 - Kerry
Indiana 11 - Bush

Iowa 7
Kansas 6 - Bush
Kentucky 8 - Bush
Louisiana 9 - Bush
Maine 4 - Kerry

Maryland 10 - Kerry
Massachusetts 12 - Kerry
Michigan 17 - Kerry
Minnesota 10 - Kerry
Mississippi 6 - Bush

Missouri 11 - Bush
Montana 3 - Bush
Nebraska 5 - Bush
Nevada 5 - Bush
New Hampshire 4 - Kerry

New Jersey 15 - Kerry
New Mexico 5
New York 31 - Kerry
North Carolina 15 - Bush
North Dakota 3 - Bush

Ohio 20 - Bush
Oklahoma 7 - Bush
Oregon 7 - Kerry
Pennsylvania 21 - Kerry
Rhode Island 4 - Kerry

South Carolina 8 - Bush
South Dakota 3 - Bush
Tennessee 11 - Bush
Texas 34 - Bush
Utah 5 - Bush

Vermont 3 - Kerry
Virginia 13 - Bush
Washington 11 - Kerry
West Virginia 5 - Bush
Wisconsin 10 - Kerry
Wyoming 3 - Bush

DascHOLE is Gone - Dirty Democrud Sent Walking Papers

11.03.04 (4:12 am) [edit]

Daschle fell to former Rep. John Thune, the first Senate party leader to lose a race for re-election in more than a half century.

It couldn't happen to a nicer swine. He talked out of both sides of his mouth even when running in his home state.

He is a double-dealing liar.

It will be nice to see him shuffling along the streets of D.C. to sell access like the rest of the Pimps and whores inside the beltway.

If you run into him be sure to tell him that he got what he deserved.

How does humiliation feel?

269 - One to go

11.02.04 (8:59 pm) [edit]

Electoral Votes
270 of 538 needed to win
Bush
269
Kerry
221

Life Sux for Kerry Lickers

11.02.04 (8:27 pm) [edit]

It looks like a wake at Kerry Headquarters.

I am happy to say that Bush looks like a winner here.

I am also happy to say that I feel your pain.